Barack Obama was elected to be our 44th President of the United States of America. I am excited for this new era in America's history. I want to believe Obama when he says he'll bring about change that's good for America. I want to be excited again about our leadership. I hope he can deliver. I'm excited to watch him do it. Eventhough I did not vote for him, I want him to deliver on his promises, and I hope he'll be centrist in his decision making. I'll support him in his quest.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Obama is Rosemary's Baby ... All Grown Up
From our guest columnist Charles Stewart, a former Utah State Senator
Barack Obama is a dangerous, destructive threat to the Constitution and the freedoms it ensures to the citizens of the United States of America.
On this past Halloween or Devil’s night I was reminded of a very ominous movie: Rosemary’s Baby. This movie is about a less than immaculate conception between the Devil and a mortal woman in an attempt to give birth to a human antichrist, the Devil’s Son, allowing evil to at last triumph over good. The coven of witches in the movie provided excellent pre-natal care. After the birth the coven took the baby and nourished him to insure he fulfilled his destiny: the capturing of men’s souls by destroying their individual freedom.
Barack Obama is Rosemary’s baby all grown up. William Ayers, the erstwhile Lord of the Flies, is his spiritual father. After all, we now know that Ayers is really the “ghost” writer of Obama’s book, “Dreams of My Father”. These “Dreams” are not his biological father’s dreams but those of his spiritual father, William Ayers.
William Ayers grew up hating America. He and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn formed the Weatherman Underground, a terrorist organization that used violence to bomb the Capitol Building and kill police officers. They remain admitted criminals who escaped conviction through a legal technicality. Many revolutionary counter culturalists of their generation changed from violent means of destroying the United States to more sophisticated tactics by entering main stream America through higher education, politics and the media. They now control many of these institutions. Ayers became a tenured university professor. He created a pedagogy for children, now used in some public schools, that revises our history and instructs his students that the US Constitution, which he abhors, is not an inspired but a flawed document. It teaches that the United States is an evil and oppressive country that should be replaced by a one world order. Through this curriculum Ayers now subtly terrorizes our children.
Ayers understood the power of using the public schools to reeducate our children. He also understood the possibility of capturing power through legitimate political means. Imagine, if he could actually take control of the country. He wouldn’t have to waste time slowly re-educating children one school at a time. By using the very government institutions he had fought all his life to destroy, he could effect the change he coveted. If he could gain the presidency, activist courts would be created and the destruction and change of the constitution would be complete. (Barak Obama openly plans to appoint activist judges to “reinterpret” the constitution to impose absolute Central Government sovereignty over States rights and “redistribute wealth”.)
In 1987 a miracle happened. William Ayers met Barack Obama and Ayers’ prayers, so to speak, were answered. Here was an articulate, charismatic young man who shared his same counter-cultural, anti-American philosophy.
After Barack’s biological father abandoned the family, his mother continued to pursue her own revisionist education. She was a product and kindred spirit of the anti-establishment, pseudo-revolutionary 1960’s of Patty Hearst and the Symbionese Liberation Army, Charles Manson, the Black Panthers, Haight-Ashbury and the Weatherman Underground, all of whom advocated the violent overthrow of the United States. Obama was raised with this anti-American sentiment as the underlying core value in his home. He was literally taught at his mother’s knee that America was a bad and oppressive imperialistic nation that should be overthrown and that the constitution was flawed. As a child, his soul couldn’t help but be imbued with the anti-American philosophy of his mother. When this young man entered college he quite naturally pursued the liberal mantra of universal equality and the dogma of deconstructionism that is pervasive in the unhallowed halls of higher education. He became a champion of hate and change of the American way of life. He gravitated to a religion whose pastor preached racism, hatred, conspiracy and above all wanted God to “Damn America.” Obama felt comfortable in this religion for 20 years. It resonated with who he was and what he had been taught.
.
After Ayers met Obama, Ayers recognized that here was the seed for his antichrist, his stealth messiah to once and for all destroy the Constitution of the United States and establish one rule world order. He conceived his plan and impregnated the world with his spiritual son one night in his home in Chicago when he began to mold Obama for politics. Ayers used his life long acquired financial resources and positions of influence to cultivate and protect the gestational period through the first trimester of “community activism”. Then it was on to the second trimester in the Illinois State Senate. Only the finest indoctrinators of hate such as Rashid Khalidi, the radical anti-Semite, Arab-American ally of the PLO, would be allowed to provide prenatal care. (The video tape of this meeting is being suppressed by the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune.) Now Ayers had his unborn child. No choice for abortion would be allowed. He had nurtured and mentored him, funded him and educated him in the motto of Marxist revolution: the end justifies any means. Ayers instructed him in the catechism of conspiracy. Any lie can be told. Any promise can be broken. Any relationship can be severed as long as power is gained. The third trimester in the Senate of the United States of America arrived. Now, finally, the “change we’ve been waiting for” was near. The fundamental remaking of the constitution (and the loss of individual freedom) was at hand. The complete control of men’s lives was almost his. All Ayers had to do was bring him, the One, to term without a miscarriage. His due date was Nov. 4.
Ayers got lucky and found the perfect storm for the birth of his child. A liberal Democratic Congress controlled by dedicated 60’s style socialists had come to power because a cowardly, opposition party had lost its way and was deservedly thrown out in 2006. This was combined now with an opposition candidate running a disorganized campaign, a country at war but desperately wanting peace and an African-American candidate who didn’t have to play the race card. He was the race card. Ayers even had his coven of witches in a powerful liberal anti-American media that tempted the young and the vulnerable with promises of security, equality and vengeance. This media spread a gospel of envy and hate: Individual success is evil. Forced redistribution of wealth even if unearned is not only deserved, it is a virtue (Biden’s “patriotic duty” tax increase, Obama’s redistributionist judicial appointments). Even still the conservative candidate was creeping ahead because most people are good honest people (Sarah Palin, Joe the Plumber). Then like an omen form Hell, a bear with cloven feet, drunk on socialist economic policy, rose up and crashed the stock market one month before the election or due date. The Devil himself, the Lord of the Flies, could not have planned any better the destruction of the United States, the hope of the free world and individual liberty.
Ayers and his coven are dedicated, unrepentant Marxist criminals and terrorists intent on destroying the American Dream of individual achievement substituting instead total government and authoritarian control of men’s lives. Barack Obama is their surrogate son. He may be a good person but he is heart and soul committed to the changing of America by any means. Remember: it is becoming clear that William Ayers is the principle author of Obama’s book “Dreams of My Father.” Obama is profoundly influenced by Ayers and his ilk and has been since his earliest childhood. Indeed Ayers is his spiritual father. The “audacity of lies” from the Lord of the Flies is incarnate in Barack Obama.
Rosemary’s baby has grown up.
At the end of the film, Rosemary stood over the crib with a knife, poised to kill her baby because she realized who he really was and what he would do. But she couldn’t kill him because, after all, he was her baby. (That doesn’t mean she would vote for him.) The coven stood around the crib adoringly talking about his cute little horns. And so the baby became a man.
I urge all Americans who love this country to have the courage that the former Republican controlled congress lacked and vote against Barack Obama. Look beyond the attractive, articulate, charismatic man. His horns i.e. William Ayers and Jeremy Wright aren’t so cute. We know that John McCain, for all his failings, loves this country. He has and will defend the Constitution with his life if necessary. Barak Obama does not love this country. He loves a different world with authoritarian, socialist rules. He wants to change and destroy our constitution. John McCain sincerely asks God to bless America. Barack Obama follows a priest who wants God to “damn America.”
I love America the Beautiful, land of the free and home of the brave. I believe the Constitution of the United States is a unique and inspired document. I believe the Declaration of Independence and declare it to the world as the torch of Liberty. I want to live free. This election day we have a choice: the legacy of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln or the legacy of Carl Marx, William Ayers and the Weatherman Underground. I chose freedom. I chose America. I chose John McCain.
Barack Obama is a dangerous, destructive threat to the Constitution and the freedoms it ensures to the citizens of the United States of America.
On this past Halloween or Devil’s night I was reminded of a very ominous movie: Rosemary’s Baby. This movie is about a less than immaculate conception between the Devil and a mortal woman in an attempt to give birth to a human antichrist, the Devil’s Son, allowing evil to at last triumph over good. The coven of witches in the movie provided excellent pre-natal care. After the birth the coven took the baby and nourished him to insure he fulfilled his destiny: the capturing of men’s souls by destroying their individual freedom.
Barack Obama is Rosemary’s baby all grown up. William Ayers, the erstwhile Lord of the Flies, is his spiritual father. After all, we now know that Ayers is really the “ghost” writer of Obama’s book, “Dreams of My Father”. These “Dreams” are not his biological father’s dreams but those of his spiritual father, William Ayers.
William Ayers grew up hating America. He and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn formed the Weatherman Underground, a terrorist organization that used violence to bomb the Capitol Building and kill police officers. They remain admitted criminals who escaped conviction through a legal technicality. Many revolutionary counter culturalists of their generation changed from violent means of destroying the United States to more sophisticated tactics by entering main stream America through higher education, politics and the media. They now control many of these institutions. Ayers became a tenured university professor. He created a pedagogy for children, now used in some public schools, that revises our history and instructs his students that the US Constitution, which he abhors, is not an inspired but a flawed document. It teaches that the United States is an evil and oppressive country that should be replaced by a one world order. Through this curriculum Ayers now subtly terrorizes our children.
Ayers understood the power of using the public schools to reeducate our children. He also understood the possibility of capturing power through legitimate political means. Imagine, if he could actually take control of the country. He wouldn’t have to waste time slowly re-educating children one school at a time. By using the very government institutions he had fought all his life to destroy, he could effect the change he coveted. If he could gain the presidency, activist courts would be created and the destruction and change of the constitution would be complete. (Barak Obama openly plans to appoint activist judges to “reinterpret” the constitution to impose absolute Central Government sovereignty over States rights and “redistribute wealth”.)
In 1987 a miracle happened. William Ayers met Barack Obama and Ayers’ prayers, so to speak, were answered. Here was an articulate, charismatic young man who shared his same counter-cultural, anti-American philosophy.
After Barack’s biological father abandoned the family, his mother continued to pursue her own revisionist education. She was a product and kindred spirit of the anti-establishment, pseudo-revolutionary 1960’s of Patty Hearst and the Symbionese Liberation Army, Charles Manson, the Black Panthers, Haight-Ashbury and the Weatherman Underground, all of whom advocated the violent overthrow of the United States. Obama was raised with this anti-American sentiment as the underlying core value in his home. He was literally taught at his mother’s knee that America was a bad and oppressive imperialistic nation that should be overthrown and that the constitution was flawed. As a child, his soul couldn’t help but be imbued with the anti-American philosophy of his mother. When this young man entered college he quite naturally pursued the liberal mantra of universal equality and the dogma of deconstructionism that is pervasive in the unhallowed halls of higher education. He became a champion of hate and change of the American way of life. He gravitated to a religion whose pastor preached racism, hatred, conspiracy and above all wanted God to “Damn America.” Obama felt comfortable in this religion for 20 years. It resonated with who he was and what he had been taught.
.
After Ayers met Obama, Ayers recognized that here was the seed for his antichrist, his stealth messiah to once and for all destroy the Constitution of the United States and establish one rule world order. He conceived his plan and impregnated the world with his spiritual son one night in his home in Chicago when he began to mold Obama for politics. Ayers used his life long acquired financial resources and positions of influence to cultivate and protect the gestational period through the first trimester of “community activism”. Then it was on to the second trimester in the Illinois State Senate. Only the finest indoctrinators of hate such as Rashid Khalidi, the radical anti-Semite, Arab-American ally of the PLO, would be allowed to provide prenatal care. (The video tape of this meeting is being suppressed by the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune.) Now Ayers had his unborn child. No choice for abortion would be allowed. He had nurtured and mentored him, funded him and educated him in the motto of Marxist revolution: the end justifies any means. Ayers instructed him in the catechism of conspiracy. Any lie can be told. Any promise can be broken. Any relationship can be severed as long as power is gained. The third trimester in the Senate of the United States of America arrived. Now, finally, the “change we’ve been waiting for” was near. The fundamental remaking of the constitution (and the loss of individual freedom) was at hand. The complete control of men’s lives was almost his. All Ayers had to do was bring him, the One, to term without a miscarriage. His due date was Nov. 4.
Ayers got lucky and found the perfect storm for the birth of his child. A liberal Democratic Congress controlled by dedicated 60’s style socialists had come to power because a cowardly, opposition party had lost its way and was deservedly thrown out in 2006. This was combined now with an opposition candidate running a disorganized campaign, a country at war but desperately wanting peace and an African-American candidate who didn’t have to play the race card. He was the race card. Ayers even had his coven of witches in a powerful liberal anti-American media that tempted the young and the vulnerable with promises of security, equality and vengeance. This media spread a gospel of envy and hate: Individual success is evil. Forced redistribution of wealth even if unearned is not only deserved, it is a virtue (Biden’s “patriotic duty” tax increase, Obama’s redistributionist judicial appointments). Even still the conservative candidate was creeping ahead because most people are good honest people (Sarah Palin, Joe the Plumber). Then like an omen form Hell, a bear with cloven feet, drunk on socialist economic policy, rose up and crashed the stock market one month before the election or due date. The Devil himself, the Lord of the Flies, could not have planned any better the destruction of the United States, the hope of the free world and individual liberty.
Ayers and his coven are dedicated, unrepentant Marxist criminals and terrorists intent on destroying the American Dream of individual achievement substituting instead total government and authoritarian control of men’s lives. Barack Obama is their surrogate son. He may be a good person but he is heart and soul committed to the changing of America by any means. Remember: it is becoming clear that William Ayers is the principle author of Obama’s book “Dreams of My Father.” Obama is profoundly influenced by Ayers and his ilk and has been since his earliest childhood. Indeed Ayers is his spiritual father. The “audacity of lies” from the Lord of the Flies is incarnate in Barack Obama.
Rosemary’s baby has grown up.
At the end of the film, Rosemary stood over the crib with a knife, poised to kill her baby because she realized who he really was and what he would do. But she couldn’t kill him because, after all, he was her baby. (That doesn’t mean she would vote for him.) The coven stood around the crib adoringly talking about his cute little horns. And so the baby became a man.
I urge all Americans who love this country to have the courage that the former Republican controlled congress lacked and vote against Barack Obama. Look beyond the attractive, articulate, charismatic man. His horns i.e. William Ayers and Jeremy Wright aren’t so cute. We know that John McCain, for all his failings, loves this country. He has and will defend the Constitution with his life if necessary. Barak Obama does not love this country. He loves a different world with authoritarian, socialist rules. He wants to change and destroy our constitution. John McCain sincerely asks God to bless America. Barack Obama follows a priest who wants God to “damn America.”
I love America the Beautiful, land of the free and home of the brave. I believe the Constitution of the United States is a unique and inspired document. I believe the Declaration of Independence and declare it to the world as the torch of Liberty. I want to live free. This election day we have a choice: the legacy of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln or the legacy of Carl Marx, William Ayers and the Weatherman Underground. I chose freedom. I chose America. I chose John McCain.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Which do you value more?
The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times seem to be battling it out for which issue matters more to Americans and/or the world in this election. People vote for different leaders for different reasons. The following two articles are examples of this.
Rebranding the U.S. with Obama
An Obamanomics Preview
What do you think are the most important issues to be voting on this election, and do you think any of them is more critically important than another?
Rebranding the U.S. with Obama
An Obamanomics Preview
What do you think are the most important issues to be voting on this election, and do you think any of them is more critically important than another?
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
What does this phrase, "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" mean to you? And, how is our government supposed to support those ideals for American citizens? Most political arguments go back to this very question.
Is it about keeping America the force to be reckoned with around the world? Is it about keeping us safe? Is it about ensuring that every citizen gets equal opportunites and benefits?
In the past couple of days, some interesting thoughts have surfaced. One from a Wall Street Journal Opinion article titled, What Independent Voters Want by John P. Avlon, and the other is from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's Wriston Lecture to the Manhattan Institute last week as printed in the Wall Street Journal.
Here's what Avlon has to say about Independent voters.
"Independent voters, once a political afterthought, are now the largest and fastest-growing segment of the American electorate. ...
In fact, the movement has a coherent set of underlying beliefs: Independents tend to be fiscally conservative, socially progressive and strong on national security. They believe in putting patriotism over partisanship and the national interest over special interests. ...
Americans are not deeply divided -- our political parties are -- and the explosive growth of independent voters is a direct reaction to this disconnect."
Unfortunately, no political party has it all. Democrats (liberal) believe in freedom of social choice for our lives. Republicans (conservative) believe in freedom of enterprise. Democrats are seen as the compassionate, fairer people. Republicans are seen as more family oriented and religious. Democrats are seen as more open minded, and Republicans are seen as narrow minded. Democrats seem younger, hipper. Republicans seem older.
But, in this election season, our candidates are pictures of hipocracy. Obama's voting record tows his party line almost 100% of the time, yet he comes across as more open-minded about things. On the other hand, McCain, who's record shows he's acted in a successful bipartisan effort numerous times, seems more narrow-minded about issues.
Obama says the the Rebulicans and Wall Street are perpetuating a self indulgent society, but he's planning to centralize all major entitlement programs to be operated by the government to make sure everyone gets equal healthcare, education, social security and welfare assistance. And, the way he's going to do it is by taxing the wealthy more so that he can give it to those who don't earn as much and may need the help more. How is that not perpetuating the self indulgence of our society? Do the politicians just switch back and forth between who they give benefits to? First it's lenient regulations for Wall Steet, now it's tax rebates for the lower middle class? Why not allow people to work for something - including the Wall Street tycoons?
Justice Thomas states,
"Today, we live in a far different environment. My generation, the self-indulgent "me" generation, has had a profound effect on much around us. Rarely do we hear a message of sacrifice -- unless it is a justification for more taxation and transfers of wealth to others. Nor do we hear from leaders or politicians the message that there is something larger and more important than the government providing for all of our needs and wants -- large and small. The message today seems more like: Ask not what you can do for yourselves or your country, but what your country must do for you."
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is what every American and citizen of this world deserves, but there is a proven fact that without hard work, sacrifice and service, no one can find life, liberty or happiness. How can we bring those things back to America without favoring or suppressing any one group of people to get there?
Is it about keeping America the force to be reckoned with around the world? Is it about keeping us safe? Is it about ensuring that every citizen gets equal opportunites and benefits?
In the past couple of days, some interesting thoughts have surfaced. One from a Wall Street Journal Opinion article titled, What Independent Voters Want by John P. Avlon, and the other is from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's Wriston Lecture to the Manhattan Institute last week as printed in the Wall Street Journal.
Here's what Avlon has to say about Independent voters.
"Independent voters, once a political afterthought, are now the largest and fastest-growing segment of the American electorate. ...
In fact, the movement has a coherent set of underlying beliefs: Independents tend to be fiscally conservative, socially progressive and strong on national security. They believe in putting patriotism over partisanship and the national interest over special interests. ...
Americans are not deeply divided -- our political parties are -- and the explosive growth of independent voters is a direct reaction to this disconnect."
Unfortunately, no political party has it all. Democrats (liberal) believe in freedom of social choice for our lives. Republicans (conservative) believe in freedom of enterprise. Democrats are seen as the compassionate, fairer people. Republicans are seen as more family oriented and religious. Democrats are seen as more open minded, and Republicans are seen as narrow minded. Democrats seem younger, hipper. Republicans seem older.
But, in this election season, our candidates are pictures of hipocracy. Obama's voting record tows his party line almost 100% of the time, yet he comes across as more open-minded about things. On the other hand, McCain, who's record shows he's acted in a successful bipartisan effort numerous times, seems more narrow-minded about issues.
Obama says the the Rebulicans and Wall Street are perpetuating a self indulgent society, but he's planning to centralize all major entitlement programs to be operated by the government to make sure everyone gets equal healthcare, education, social security and welfare assistance. And, the way he's going to do it is by taxing the wealthy more so that he can give it to those who don't earn as much and may need the help more. How is that not perpetuating the self indulgence of our society? Do the politicians just switch back and forth between who they give benefits to? First it's lenient regulations for Wall Steet, now it's tax rebates for the lower middle class? Why not allow people to work for something - including the Wall Street tycoons?
Justice Thomas states,
"Today, we live in a far different environment. My generation, the self-indulgent "me" generation, has had a profound effect on much around us. Rarely do we hear a message of sacrifice -- unless it is a justification for more taxation and transfers of wealth to others. Nor do we hear from leaders or politicians the message that there is something larger and more important than the government providing for all of our needs and wants -- large and small. The message today seems more like: Ask not what you can do for yourselves or your country, but what your country must do for you."
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is what every American and citizen of this world deserves, but there is a proven fact that without hard work, sacrifice and service, no one can find life, liberty or happiness. How can we bring those things back to America without favoring or suppressing any one group of people to get there?
Friday, October 17, 2008
Change is Needed, but What Kind and How Much?
Question: Both Barack Obama and John McCain vow to change things when they become President of the United States. But what will their change entail, specifically as it has to do with their use of the word fundamental? Sen. Obama uses it to describe the change he's going to make - "fundamental change", and Sen. McCain uses it to describe what's gone on - "the fundamentals of our economy are strong". Please respond.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Obama is Undermining What America Is
This election cycle has been intense. And, Barack Obama will undermine Americans and the Founding Fathers, if he becomes the next President of the United States of America.
The problem is, he is fooling everyone into thinking he's what America needs - and so desparately. He speaks clearly. He says that help is on the way for all Americans - in every circumstance. He's cool under pressure. He's handsome. He's likable. But, he's disgracing the principles America was founded under: Independence, hard work, freedom and small government.
He will take over all major programs - health care, education, welfare, social security and finance, and not allow us a choice in the matter. We will not be able to choose which education our children have. We will not empower people to work hard and get themselves out of welfare, and our businesses will be so bogged down by taxes and regulations, they will not want to produce or hire workers. The downside of giving everything to people is that those people then lose their freedom to choose for themselves.
But, there is a bigger issue here - Obama is inextricably linked to radicals - educational, religious and idealogical radicals. William Ayers - a college professor in Illinois - bombed American government buildings in the 1970s. He supports education that will liberate the captive and teach people about the evils of American capitalism. Reverend Jeremiah Wright teaches his congregation about Black Liberation Theology which has an undercurrent of hatred for the way America has been running for the past 100+ years. Down with the evil white man. Obama's ACORN group is misrepresenting voter registration forms and has been for years.
These groups of people are not for America. They're for destroying America. Or changing it completely from the way it was organized.
A vote for Barack Obama is a vote that America is fundamentally flawed and has been wrong all these years. Obama's change is radical, un-American change.
The problem is, he is fooling everyone into thinking he's what America needs - and so desparately. He speaks clearly. He says that help is on the way for all Americans - in every circumstance. He's cool under pressure. He's handsome. He's likable. But, he's disgracing the principles America was founded under: Independence, hard work, freedom and small government.
He will take over all major programs - health care, education, welfare, social security and finance, and not allow us a choice in the matter. We will not be able to choose which education our children have. We will not empower people to work hard and get themselves out of welfare, and our businesses will be so bogged down by taxes and regulations, they will not want to produce or hire workers. The downside of giving everything to people is that those people then lose their freedom to choose for themselves.
But, there is a bigger issue here - Obama is inextricably linked to radicals - educational, religious and idealogical radicals. William Ayers - a college professor in Illinois - bombed American government buildings in the 1970s. He supports education that will liberate the captive and teach people about the evils of American capitalism. Reverend Jeremiah Wright teaches his congregation about Black Liberation Theology which has an undercurrent of hatred for the way America has been running for the past 100+ years. Down with the evil white man. Obama's ACORN group is misrepresenting voter registration forms and has been for years.
These groups of people are not for America. They're for destroying America. Or changing it completely from the way it was organized.
A vote for Barack Obama is a vote that America is fundamentally flawed and has been wrong all these years. Obama's change is radical, un-American change.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
